Duration: 00:60 minutes Upload Time: 2006-07-01 06:43:34 User: wuziq :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Tags:
Description: ok, frame number on all frames this time. |
|
Comments | |
tdrehfal ::: Favorites 2006-11-12 20:23:13 that would really suck. __________________________________________________ | |
impider ::: Favorites 2006-11-02 19:05:46 pluss wot sadoos have added it two ther faverts __________________________________________________ | |
impider ::: Favorites 2006-11-02 19:04:26 pointless crapp, wot a wast of time, 1 minit of bordem __________________________________________________ | |
Ultima22 ::: Favorites 2006-10-30 15:46:58 thats 1:37 seconds that these two youtube tests wasted __________________________________________________ | |
nandousio ::: Favorites 2006-10-23 10:26:45 y don't understand you, i'm spanish, and my english ys very bad __________________________________________________ | |
wuziq ::: Favorites 2006-10-22 21:01:55 "it tells you the fps that youtube is capable of" "not the number, but rather to prove whether there's a good speed (i guess framerate) at which to send the videos" am i rite? __________________________________________________ | |
nandousio ::: Favorites 2006-10-22 20:07:56 FRAMES/Second, you can see the speed of youtube with the images te dice las frames por segundo que es capaz de alcanzar youtube no el numero, sino para provar si tiene una buena velocidad de transmision de archivos __________________________________________________ | |
NFS4LFE ::: Favorites 2006-10-10 18:06:26 interesting __________________________________________________ | |
satchguy ::: Favorites 2006-10-04 21:29:31 can't wait till you tube randomizes the frame number for the thumbnail! LOL __________________________________________________ | |
Assiman ::: Favorites 2006-09-24 16:14:33 I don't understand anything __________________________________________________ | |
jz33040 ::: Favorites 2006-09-15 02:32:38 Actually I see that 899 is 1/2 of 1798. I must have made a mistake. lol.. But with frame 1 being 0, I see what you mean. I guess youtube chooses to pick 899 since there is no middle. Thanks for telling me about avisynth. :-) __________________________________________________ | |
wuziq ::: Favorites 2006-09-13 19:14:12 actually there are 1799 frames (it starts counting at 0). half of that is 899.5. i guess youtube rounds down to 899. anyway, i used avisynth to create the clip. __________________________________________________ | |
jz33040 ::: Favorites 2006-09-13 14:11:28 Wow, neat experiment. So 899 is less than 1/2 of 1798. I figured it would be 1/2 and it's not. What did you use to make frames? Your camera? software? __________________________________________________ | |
wuziq ::: Favorites 2006-09-10 18:02:57 just a test to see which frame it uses for the thumbnail. __________________________________________________ | |
Danz1234567890 ::: Favorites 2006-09-09 14:41:27 test of wat? I dont understand any of this video, is jus numbas. __________________________________________________ |
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
better youtube test
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment